Long Ledges Preserve in Sullivan, Maine
Located in Sullivan, Maine, Long Ledges Preserve is 318 acres of mossy upland forest filled with boulders and granite outcroppings. Owned and maintained by the Frenchman Bay Conservancy, the preserve features more than 3.5 miles of intersecting trails, and this trail network connects with the adjacent trail network of Baker Hill Preserve (which features about 2 miles of trails). Other interesting natural features of the land include vernal pools, small wetlands, the 59-acre Long Pond, the small Postage Stamp Pond, and an overgrown historic granite quarry.
To learn more about the preserve, including driving directions, stay tuned for the website aislinnsarnacki.com, which is currently under construction.
To follow Aislinn's Adventures, subscribe to this channel!
Frenchman Bay Tidal Falls Preserve in Maine
via YouTube Capture
tidal falls.MOV
Tidal Falls, Hancock, Maine
Sullivan Falls 8:13:13
Sea Kayaking at Sullivan Falls, Maine, 8/13/13
Tidal Falls, Hancock, Maine, October 8, 2013
2018 Schoodic Sea Kayak Retreat Slideshow
A short version of the slide show of scenes from the 2018 Schoodic Sea Kayak Retreat put on by Guillemot-Kayaks.com and SeaSherpaKayak.com.
The Schoodic district of Acadia National Park has some of the finest kayaking on the east coast. We toured the rocky shore of Schoodic Point and Ironbound Island as well as venturing into the Sullivan Falls tidal stream.
Reversing Falls in Hancock, ME
Be sure to subscribe to our channel for more videos like this:
This sis a clip of the reversing falls in Hancock, Maine. The falls or cascade reverses twice a day depending on the tide. You'll also see a whirlpool which is part of the action.
Impeachment trial of President Trump | Jan. 29, 2020 (FULL LIVE STREAM)
House impeachment managers and President Trump’s lawyers have concluded their opening arguments in the Senate. The impeachment trial moves into the question period for both sides on Jan. 29, when senators submit questions in writing to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. The chief justice will read questions out loud, alternating between the majority and minority for up to eight hours.
Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives in December for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Impeachment does not mean that the president has been removed from office. In the next phase, the Senate must hold a trial to make that determination. A Senate impeachment trial has happened only two other times in American history and once in the modern era. At the center of the Democrats’ case is that Trump sought to withhold military assistance and an Oval Office meeting until Ukraine announced investigations into former vice president Joe Biden and his son.
Watch the debate on Jan. 21 on the rules of the trial:
Watch the first day of opening arguments on Jan. 22:
Watch the second day of opening arguments on Jan. 23:
Watch the third day of opening arguments on Jan. 24:
Watch the first day of Trump’s legal team’s defense on Jan. 25:
Watch the second day of Trump’s legal team’s defense on Jan. 27:
Watch the third day of Trump’s legal team’s defense on Jan. 28:
#trumpimpeachmenttrial Read more: Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube:
Follow us:
Twitter:
Instagram:
Facebook:
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL LIVE: Senate questions House managers and Trump's legal team – 1/29/2020
President Donald Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate resumes Wednesday, with the Senate poised to question his legal team and the House managers.
» Subscribe to CNBC TV:
» Subscribe to CNBC:
» Subscribe to CNBC Classic:
Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news:
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn:
Follow CNBC News on Facebook:
Follow CNBC News on Twitter:
Follow CNBC News on Instagram:
#CNBC
#CNBC TV
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL LIVE: Senate questions House managers and Trump's legal team – 1/29/2020
Cobscook:Bold Coast 8:28 8:30 2013
Three days of sea kayaking in Downeast Maine.
Toward a New Global Architecture? America’s Role in a Changing World | Radcliffe Day 2018
Radcliffe Day 2018 opens with a panel titled “Toward a New Global Architecture? America’s Role in a Changing World.” In 2009, then–Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a vision for a global architecture “in which states have clear incentives to cooperate and live up to their responsibilities, as well as strong disincentives to sit on the sidelines or sow discord and division.” Nearly a decade later, the United States is still grappling with complex questions about its role in global affairs.
Nicholas Burns (10:29), the Roy and Barbara Goodman Family Professor of the Practice of Diplomacy and International Relations at Harvard Kennedy School and a career diplomat who served as US ambassador to NATO and undersecretary of state for political affairs, moderates a discussion exploring these issues. The panel features the foreign policy experts Michèle Flournoy ’83, David Ignatius ’72, Meghan O’Sullivan, and Anne-Marie Slaughter JD ’85.
Introduction by Lizabeth Cohen, dean of the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study and the Howard Mumford Jones Professor of American Studies at Harvard University
For information about the Radcliffe Institute and its many public programs, visit
Facebook:
Twitter:
Instagram:
Civil Discourse in an Uncivil Age
In this one hour special Wyoming PBS partners with Wyoming Humanities and the University of Wyoming to host Alexander Heffner, journalist & civic Educator and the host of PBS’s The Open Mind, for a public discussion on “Civil Discourse in an Uncivil Age: The Quest for a Post-Partisan Citizenship.” Also, retired Justice Marilyn Kite, Senator Affie Ellis and former legislator Tim Stubson participate.
Cave Hill Live Stream
Sabbath 17th November 2018 - Deacon & Deaconess Day
AIR Dibrugarh Online Radio Live Stream
Auburn Coach Wife Kristi Malzahn Agrees with Match & eHarmony: Men are Jerks
My advice is this: Settle! That's right. Don't worry about passion or intense connection. Don't nix a guy based on his annoying habit of yelling Bravo! in movie theaters. Overlook his halitosis or abysmal sense of aesthetics. Because if you want to have the infrastructure in place to have a family, settling is the way to go. Based on my observations, in fact, settling will probably make you happier in the long run, since many of those who marry with great expectations become more disillusioned with each passing year. (It's hard to maintain that level of zing when the conversation morphs into discussions about who's changing the diapers or balancing the checkbook.)
Obviously, I wasn't always an advocate of settling. In fact, it took not settling to make me realize that settling is the better option, and even though settling is a rampant phenomenon, talking about it in a positive light makes people profoundly uncomfortable. Whenever I make the case for settling, people look at me with creased brows of disapproval or frowns of disappointment, the way a child might look at an older sibling who just informed her that Jerry's Kids aren't going to walk, even if you send them money. It's not only politically incorrect to get behind settling, it's downright un-American. Our culture tells us to keep our eyes on the prize (while our mothers, who know better, tell us not to be so picky), and the theme of holding out for true love (whatever that is—look at the divorce rate) permeates our collective mentality.
Even situation comedies, starting in the 1970s with The Mary Tyler Moore Show and going all the way to Friends, feature endearing single women in the dating trenches, and there's supposed to be something romantic and even heroic about their search for true love. Of course, the crucial difference is that, whereas the earlier series begins after Mary has been jilted by her fiancé, the more modern-day Friends opens as Rachel Green leaves her nice-guy orthodontist fiancé at the altar simply because she isn't feeling it. But either way, in episode after episode, as both women continue to be unlucky in love, settling starts to look pretty darn appealing. Mary is supposed to be contentedly independent and fulfilled by her newsroom family, but in fact her life seems lonely. Are we to assume that at the end of the series, Mary, by then in her late 30s, found her soul mate after the lights in the newsroom went out and her work family was disbanded? If her experience was anything like mine or that of my single friends, it's unlikely.
And while Rachel and her supposed soul mate, Ross, finally get together (for the umpteenth time) in the finale of Friends, do we feel confident that she'll be happier with Ross than she would have been had she settled down with Barry, the orthodontist, 10 years earlier? She and Ross have passion but have never had long-term stability, and the fireworks she experiences with him but not with Barry might actually turn out to be a liability, given how many times their relationship has already gone up in flames. It's equally questionable whether Sex and the City's Carrie Bradshaw, who cheated on her kindhearted and generous boyfriend, Aidan, only to end up with the more exciting but self-absorbed Mr. Big, will be better off in the framework of marriage and family. (Some time after the breakup, when Carrie ran into Aidan on the street, he was carrying his infant in a Baby Björn. Can anyone imagine Mr. Big walking around with a Björn?)